Damage & Repairs

Why the risk of damage is usually lower than feared

In Coburns’ experience, routine work often carries less risk than owners fear. Assess the particular project and take proportionate precautions.
Clear, practical guidanceThis article is written for adjoining owners. For advice about your own notice, award or neighbour’s works, speak to Coburns Party Wall.

Why fear is often greater than reality

Party Wall discussions naturally focus on what could go wrong: cracking, movement, excavation, temporary support and weathering. Listing risks is not the same as saying they are likely to happen.

Practice-based indications

Based on Coburns’ practical experience, identifiable damage is encountered in roughly 1–2% of matters involving work directly to a party structure and below 1% in ordinary nearby-excavation matters. These are Coburns’ practice-based estimates, not independently verified national statistics or a prediction for an individual property. The likelihood and severity of damage vary by project.

An award can still reduce risk

The award can regulate relevant sequencing, temporary support, weather protection, access and other proportionate measures.

An award can mitigate inconvenience too

For many adjoining owners the greater day-to-day benefit is having clear arrangements for disruptive operations, access, protection, contact and what happens if a problem arises.

Low risk does not mean no risk

The sensible approach is proportionate protection, not complacency and not alarmism.

Key takeaway

The aim is to manage a relatively small risk sensibly and make the much more common inconveniences easier to live with.

This page provides general information about the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and common practice. It is not legal advice and does not replace advice on the facts of a particular matter.