Guides

How you can use consent as leverage — constructively

Consent can create an opportunity to agree sensible practical protections before a dispute and surveyor appointments become necessary. It should not be used to demand unrelated concessions.
Clear, practical guidanceThis article is written for adjoining owners. For advice about your own notice, award or neighbour’s works, speak to Coburns Party Wall.

Overview

When you receive a notice, you do not always have to choose immediately between unconditional consent and a full surveyor dispute. In many cases there is an opportunity to ask sensible questions and agree practical arrangements with the building owner before deciding how to respond.

What useful leverage can look like

If you are broadly comfortable with the work but want reassurance about how it will affect you, your willingness to consent can encourage the building owner to provide information or agree practical arrangements that avoid a formal dispute.

  • A schedule of condition before work starts.
  • Clear contact details for the owner or contractor.
  • Reasonable notice before particularly disruptive operations.
  • Agreed access arrangements where access will be needed.
  • Specific protective measures relevant to your property.
  • Clarification of excavation, temporary support or weathering details where genuinely required.
  • A simple written record of any additional practical agreement reached between the owners.

Do not overplay it

Consent should not become a ransom demand. If you use it to seek unrelated planning concessions, money, changes to parts of the design that do not affect the Party Wall issues, or conditions that are unnecessary and disproportionate, the building owner may simply accept that a dispute exists and proceed through the statutory surveyor process.

That may leave you with less direct influence, more professional cost and a more formal relationship than would have existed if the practical points had been handled sensibly at the outset.

There is an important distinction for a new wall astride the boundary

Where the proposal is to build a new party wall or party fence wall astride the boundary under section 1, the adjoining owner’s written consent is specifically required. If that consent is not given, the building owner cannot simply use the Act to force an astride wall and must ordinarily build wholly on their own land. That gives the adjoining owner a genuinely different decision from consenting to ordinary section 2 or section 6 work.

Even there, sensible negotiation is usually better than trying to extract unrelated concessions. The useful discussion is about the wall itself, its position, practical consequences and any genuinely connected terms.

This page provides general information about the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and common practice. It is not legal advice and does not replace advice on the facts of a particular matter.